The Xbox 360 is the same think for cheaper with exclusive games, so Xbox 360 is a much better console. The PS3 almost never uses all of the graphic's it can which means games on both consoles or at Xbox 360 level. Why should the customer have to pay for a game console that is not even useing all of the special lasers room? they should have to. the Blue Ray is a fine devices but forcing something on customers that at almost never is fully used is clearly a bad choice. Sony keeps forgetting it's markets as well. For example PS2 had many great JRPG games and PS3 has basically close to zero a few years in. Xbox 360 has JRPG game that are on there system only, was on there system first by a long shoot, and still has exclusive titles like Star ocean 4 coming. Sony has lost the will to pay for exclusives with a over cost device and there going to fall like a Dreamcast at this rate. When you buy a Blue Ray there is no other exclusive point to get a PS3 over a much cheaper $179 Xbox 260 Arcade Model.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Croft
I think the PS3 is better choice because the PS3 is good for a lot of things. The PS3 plays Blu-Rays so you wont need to buy a Blu-Ray player, The PS3 has an internet browser and you don't need to pay to play with friends online and The PS3 has got MGS4 and Resistance and some great looking exclusives on the way and most games are muli-format now anyway.
|
I got my Blue Ray without a PS3 for under 100$ so do tell me why the PS3 is worth anything to me! This is a game consoles where talking about here after all, show me the games! Add on's are just that Add On's there not going to make the game console. If they did make the game console then PSP which is selling badly would have won over the Apple I Pod MP3 Market.